You are welcome to discuss various security topics with our professional team and other users like you!
Read our Registration Agreement and create your FREE account here!

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - test4just

Pages: [1]
Hi, I am also fighting with .id-3113278688_johndoe@weekendwarrior55(.)com. RakhniDecryptor for .doc and .xls runs 2 days and "cannot recover password", for .mfd and .dbf does not run at all saying "Unsupported file type". For .jpg runs for 2 hours and "Password has been recovered succesfully". It shows that all the encrypted files have been decrypted. Now the files have the correct extension (with no  "@weekendwarrior"), but when trying to open, all of them are still encrypted (including the .jpg). I would like to send you samples of both encrypted and "Rakhni-decrypted" file. I have just registered to your forum and I do not know how or at what e-mail address to send the files.

Edit by Sensadmin: I modified the link, so it's not clickable or associatable with e-mails.

" Please, Miloss66 and mbuljan, can you look in the log file of rakhnidecryptor and tell the "Current state number" where it found the key? This can save us 2 days of computing. Thank you! "

It worked for about 24 houres. It said it had found the password, but nothing happened. I unchecked the "delete encrypted files after decryption" so the file that I wanted to decrypt remained the same. No other copy of that file was made (like a decrypted one). I ran the Rakhni tool under a VirtualMachine and someone else clicked ok after Rakhni finished (that person told me that the only option in the tool at the end was ok or close, with the message : Password has been found). The file is still encrypted. In the Rakhni log file the last current state looks like this:
 13:56:11.0288 0x02d0  Current state: 557976 / 1000000
I belive this is where it found the password. If so, how can I use this current state number to avoid "rescannig"?

Pages: [1]