Casa > cibernético Notícias > OS X Malware Peaks in 2015. O meu Mac é seguro?
CYBER NEWS

O malware do OS X atinge o pico em 2015. O meu Mac é seguro?

Há uma crença de que os usuários de Mac não são suscetíveis a software malicioso. Bem, havia uma crença ... Uma vasta pesquisa sobre malware para Mac revela que 2015 has been the worst so far in terms of security. The brand new report on the subject was recently published by the IT security company Bit9 + Carbon Black Threat Research team.

2015-mac-malware-report

It took the team 10 weeks to gather and analyze the data, necessary for such a paper. During that period, the researchers analyzed more than 1,400 unique OS X malware samples. The conclusion only came naturally – in 2015, the malware current towards Macs is quite strong and devastating. Their report is dubbed ‘2015: The Most Prolific Year in History for OS X Malware’. The team’s research efforts may have just cracked the illusion that Macs are immune to hacks in comparison with PCs running the Windows OS.

What Does the Research Emphasize on?

The team has closely observed the vulnerabilities in OS X, and the malware pieces that took advantage of them. They also collected samples. One good example here is the XcodeGhost. The XcodeGhost tools implement malicious components into applications created with Xcode. além disso, it was recently reported that OS X El Capitan – the twelfth major release of OS X, launched in September – contains serious security flaws in the Gatekeeper and Keychain features. Para provar seu ponto, the team has created a timeline of Mac malware, which looks like that:

2004 – 2006

  • RenepoThe 1st Mac OS X clear-cut malware.
  • Leap – a Mac worm that was spread via iChat.

2007 - 2009

  • Jahlav – a Trojan that infected the DNS settings, similarly to Windows malware.
  • MacSweep – a malware known as scareware that tricked users into buying rogue products.

2010 - 2012

  • Boonana – the JavaScript Trojan that also affected Linux and Windows.
  • MacDefender – a scareware piece generating fake security alerts.
  • FlashBack – a malware that exploits a security bug in Java, the most spread Mac malware so far.

2012 - 2014

  • Lamadai – a backdoor that exploits a Java vulnerability.
  • Kitm – a malware performing targeted attacks.
  • Hackback – similar to the one mentioned above.
  • LaoShu – a Trojan hat spreads spam via undelivered mail parcels.
  • Appetite – a Trojan that targets government organizations.
  • Coin Thief – malware that steals BitCoin logins via cracked Angry Birds apps.

How do researchers explain the uptake in Mac Malware? Here’s one pretty good justification:

This rise in Mac OS X malware comes after several years of rapid OS X market share gains, com 16.4 percent of the market now running OS X, including expanding deployment in the enterprise. This represents a growing attack surface for sensitive data, Como 45 percent of companies now offer Macs as an option to their employees.

Mac Malware Behavior Explained

Como já dissemos, the analysis was based on over 1,400 amostras, open sources, and incident response engagements. To evaluate the Mac threats, researchers can’t use common Windows malware analysis tools. To skip over this obstacle, the Bit9 + Carbon team used a number of custom and prebuilt tools such as fs_usage, dtrace, and opensnoop.

They utilized the tools and created special machines for dynamic analysis, that were run along with the custom-built Carbon Black sandbox. Thanks to these approaches, the team successfully identified common actions performed by Mac malware like file creations and network communications, observe command & control infrastructure and artifacts that were part of the malware execution.

OS X Malware Utilizes Features Such as LauchDaemons/LaunchAgents

Other leveraged features include login items and browser plugins. Another discovery that was made is that Mac malware resides in ‘userland’ and supported persistence mechanisms, instead of attempting to reside in ‘kernel-land’ by writing custom kernel extensions.

Another curious revelation made by the researchers was that adapting Unix/Lunux malware to OS X wasn’t observed, not to the point they expected. It was only logical to suspect such adaptions due to OS X’s roots in FreeBSD. Unix-style malware brought to OS X wasn’t monitored in the 10-week analysis.

Ter um olhar para o todo Bit9 + Carbon Black report .

Milena Dimitrova

Milena Dimitrova

Um escritor inspirado e gerente de conteúdo que está com SensorsTechForum desde o início do projeto. Um profissional com 10+ anos de experiência na criação de conteúdo envolvente. Focada na privacidade do usuário e desenvolvimento de malware, ela acredita fortemente em um mundo onde a segurança cibernética desempenha um papel central. Se o senso comum não faz sentido, ela vai estar lá para tomar notas. Essas notas podem mais tarde se transformar em artigos! Siga Milena @Milenyim

mais Posts

Me siga:
Twitter

Deixe um comentário

seu endereço de e-mail não será publicado. Campos obrigatórios são marcados *

Compartilhar no Facebook Compartilhar
Carregando...
Compartilhar no Twitter chilrear
Carregando...
Compartilhar no Google Plus Compartilhar
Carregando...
Partilhar no Linkedin Compartilhar
Carregando...
Compartilhar no Digg Compartilhar
Compartilhar no Reddit Compartilhar
Carregando...
Partilhar no StumbleUpon Compartilhar
Carregando...